Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
logo

Artículos de Revisión

Vol. 6 Núm. 12 (2026): Revista Simón Rodríguez

Innovación pedagógica mediante las tecnologías educativas: análisis bibliográfico de su impacto en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje

Pedagogical innovation through educational technologies: a literature review of their impact on teaching-learning processes
Publicado
2026-08-12
Introducción: La incorporación de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAG) dentro de la educación superior modificó las dinámicas de enseñanza-aprendizaje, aunque continúan existiendo disputas relativas a su eficacia metodológica en plazos largos. Objetivo: Examinar la utilidad de las acciones didácticas fundadas en IAG respecto al desempeño académico y las habilidades digitales en alumnos de educación superior. Metodología: Revisión sistemática conforme guías PRISMA 2020. Se hicieron consultas en Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed y SciELO (marzo 2026). Se tomaron 49 trabajos editados entre 2018-2026, valorándose la solidez metodológica mediante instrumento MMAT. Resultados: El 72.4% de los informes indicaron avances notorios en el rendimiento académico (crecimientos del 5.2% hasta 23.7%), mostrando impactos mayores en materias STEM y en acciones de ≥8 semanas. El 78.3% registraron progresos en capacidades digitales generales. Las opiniones de los estudiantes resultaron mayormente favorables (82.8%), mientras que los profesores exhibieron opiniones diversas, con inquietudes sobre calificación y verdad. La diversidad metodológica fue elevada (I²=79.4%). Conclusiones: La IAG funciona como un impulsor de renovación pedagógica con capacidad cambiante, pero su adopción exitosa demanda planes educativos deliberados, capacitación docente, normas institucionales definidas y tratamiento de las divisiones digitales. Son necesarios investigaciones longitudinales y en entornos variados para reforzar las pruebas.
Introduction: The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) into higher education has reshaped teaching and learning dynamics; however, ongoing debate persists regarding its long-term methodological effectiveness. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of GAI-based pedagogical interventions on academic achievement and digital competencies among higher education students. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SciELO were searched (March 2026). Forty-nine studies published between 2018 and 2026 were included, and methodological quality was appraised using the MMAT tool. Results: Seventy-two point four percent of the studies reported significant improvements in academic performance (ranging from 5.2% to 23.7%), with greater effects observed in STEM disciplines and in interventions lasting eight weeks or more. Seventy-eight point three percent documented gains in overall digital competencies. Student perceptions were predominantly favorable (82.8%), whereas faculty opinions were more divided, particularly regarding assessment practices and academic integrity. Methodological heterogeneity was considerable (I² = 79.4%). Conclusions: GAI serves as a catalyst for pedagogical renewal with transformative capacity; nevertheless, successful implementation hinges on intentional educational design, ongoing teacher development, clear institutional frameworks, and equitable access to technology. Further longitudinal and contextually diverse research is required to consolidate the available evidence.
Número:
Vol. 6 Núm. 12 (2026): Revista Simón Rodríguez
Sección:
Artículos de Revisión

Referencias

  1. Abduvalieva, G., Barsanaeva, D., Kenenbaeva, G., Kozub, H., & Aghayeva, S. (2024). Innovations in educational methodologies: Exploring the impact of digital technologies on learning and teaching. Scientific Herald Of Uzhhorod University Series Physics, 55, 2890-2899. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.289ql0
  2. Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2022). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education And Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373-1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
  3. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Cano, J. A., Gómez-Montoya, R. A., & Cortés, P. (2026). Educational technologies and pedagogical innovations in operations management education: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), ep646. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18272
  5. Çelik, F., & Baturay, M. H. (2024). Technology and innovation in shaping the future of education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00339-0
  6. Chand, S. (2026). Innovative Paradigms in Teaching and Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Pedagogies, Technologies, and Their Impact on Educational Outcomes. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.65757
  7. Chango Muñoz, B. (2026). Innovación pedagógica medida por tecnologías digitales y su incidencia en la calidad del aprendizaje en contextos educativos contemporáneos. Educational Regent Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.63969/3vmrdw49
  8. Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Butler-Henderson, K., Harman, K., & Crawford, J. (2023b). A systematic review of digital innovations in technology-enhanced learning designs in higher education. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 133-162. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7615
  9. Chowdhury, S. A., Cross, B., Hainey, T., & Baxter, G. (2025b). ict Integration in Higher Education Sector of Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Journal Of Science Of Learning And Innovations., 2(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/29497736-bja00011
  10. Del Rocío García Sánchez, M., Añorve, J. R., & Alarcón, G. G. (2018). Las Tic en la educación superior, innovaciones y retos / The ICT in higher education, innovations and challenges. RICSH Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, 6(12), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.23913/ricsh.v6i12.135
  11. Dyusheeva, S. (2025). Innovative pedagogical technologies in education. Bulletin of Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev. https://doi.org/10.33514/1694-7851-2025-3/1-122-131
  12. Golej, J. (2024). Súčasné inovatívne metódy a technológie vo vzdelávaní [Current innovative methods and technologies in education]. MANEKO. https://doi.org/10.61544/mnk/kkbj6356
  13. Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., Rocio, V., Butkienė, R., & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756
  14. Harahap, S. D., Jimmi, J., Pattiasina, P. J., Trinova, Z., & Damayanto, A. (2022). Trends in technological innovation in education during a time of pandemic disruption: Examining the perspective of teaching digital pedagogy. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1867
  15. Hassan, R. H., Hassan, M. T., Naseer, S., Khan, Z., & Jeon, M. (2021). ICT Enabled TVET Education: A Systematic Literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 81624-81650. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3085910
  16. Husni, H., Ikhsanudin, M., Juita, F., Hamzah, T., Sirozi, M., & Astuti, M. (2026). Pedagogical Innovation in Islamic Educational Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review of the Shift from Traditional to Modern Learning Paradigms. Dirasah International Journal Of Islamic Studies, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v4i1.68
  17. Joshi, B. M., & Acharya, U. (2025). ICT as a Catalyst for Pedagogical Innovation: A Review Study. Research Journal, 10(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3126/rj.v10i1.92968
  18. Kamalakar, G., & Kamala, K. (2025). Innovations in Educational Technology: Pedagogical Shifts in the Post-Pandemic World. Research Journal Of Humanities And Social Sciences, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00016
  19. Lata, K. (2024). Innovation in pedagogical practices: technology-enhanced learning in higher education. ShodhKosh Journal Of Visual And Performing Arts, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.2362
  20. Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., & Chan, H. T. (2023). Teaching and learning innovations for distance learning in the digital era: a literature review. Frontiers In Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1198034
  21. Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Madrigal-Cerezo, R. (2025). Technology-Enhanced Pedagogy in Physical Education: Bridging Engagement, Learning, and Lifelong Activity. Education Sciences, 15(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040409
  22. Maryani, N., Hardienata, S., & Suherman, I. (2026). Determinants of Lecturer Innovativeness in Higher Education: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Literature Review of Information Technology Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Achievement Motivation, and Knowledge Management. Educational Researcher Journal, 3(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.71288/educationalresearcherjournal.v3i1.136
  23. Mashwama, N., & Madubela, B. (2025). Innovations in pedagogy and technology for engineering education: A systematic review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.s1.10
  24. Mena-Guacas, A. F., López-Catalán, L., Bernal-Bravo, C., & Ballesteros-Regaña, C. (2025). Educational transformation through emerging technologies: Critical review of scientific impact on learning. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030368
  25. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-9.
  26. Moutchou, K. E., & Touate, S. (2024). Pedagogical innovation in the context of higher education 4.0: A systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(11), 2024275. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024275
  27. Msafiri, M., Kangwa, D., & Cai, L. (2023). A systematic literature review of ICT integration in secondary education: What works, what does not, and what next? Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00070-x
  28. Nhleko NM, Aroba OJ, Chisita CT (2025), A systematic review of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on student motivation: researchers’ reflections on a selected higher education institution (HEIs). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(11). 77–100,: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2024-0129
  29. Noronha, R. M. (2025). Bridging pedagogical innovation and practice: A literature review on ICT adoption in higher education. Modern Methods and Innovation Technologies in Education: Present Status, Important Questions and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.61587/mmit.tiue.uz.v1i1.167
  30. Novoa-Echaurren, Á., Canales-Tapia, A., & Molin-Karakoç, L. (2025). Pedagogical uses of ICT in Finnish and Chilean schools: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15828
  31. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71
  32. Patricio, J., Verdugo, B., Javier, R., Morillo, H., Inca, F. A., Alexandra, M., Álvarez, Y., Flor, P., & Casierra, C. (2025). Innovación Pedagógica con Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación Básica Superior en Ecuador: Potencial y Desafíos. Arandu UTIC, 12(1), 2042–2059. https://doi.org/10.69639/ARANDU.V12I1.725
  33. Pliushch, V., & Sorokun, S. (2022). Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in Education System. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 15(34), e16960. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.16960
  34. Romero-Ochoa, M., Romero-González, J., Perez-Soltero, A., Terven, J. R., García-Ramírez, T., Córdova-Esparza, D.-M., & Espinoza-Zallas, F.-A. (2025). Knowledge management strategies supported by ICT for the improvement of teaching practice: A systematic review. Information. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050414
  35. Santos, J., Figueiredo, A., & Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
  36. Santos, S. M. A. V., Aragão, A. O., Basilio, C. de L., Da Rocha, D. S., Oliveira, J. K. V., Ferreira, L. D. D., Pereira, M. T. do R., & Paixão, S. R. (2024). Pedagogy and technology: The transformative impact of digital tools in education. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.17n.2-156
  37. Segovia-García, M. S., Guerrero-Bermúdez, Á. E., Ganchozo-Loor, M. V., & Intriago-Giler, L. P. (2025). Innovación pedagógica en entornos de aprendizaje digitales [Pedagogical innovation in digital learning environments]. Multidisciplinary Collaborative Journal. https://doi.org/10.70881/mcj/v3/n1/43
  38. Sterling, M. del C. A., & Boude, O. (2026). Determinants of ICT integration in university teaching practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1800315
  39. Suyo-Vega, J. A., Fernández-Bedoya, V. H., & Meneses-la-Riva, M. E. (2024). Beyond traditional teaching: A systematic review of innovative pedagogical practices in higher education. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143392.2
  40. Tohănean, D., Vulpe, A.-M., Mijaică, R., & Alexe, D. (2025). Embedding digital technologies (AI and ICT) into physical education: A systematic review of innovations, pedagogical impact, and challenges. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179826
  41. Urcos, C. N. C., Urcos, W. H. C., Pintado, N. E. A., Miraval, R. M. O., Muñoz, M. A. C., & Rivera, L. C. P. (2026). Pedagogical innovation in digital environments: A systematic review focused on higher education. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.176682.1
  42. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Acevedo-Borrega, J., & Cerezo-Pizarro, M. (2022). Educational technology and student performance: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916502
  43. Vargas Ortiz, L. . (2025). Desafíos de la implementación de las TIC en el aula de biología: aportación sistemática en clave de innovación, equidad y educación. Revista Latinoamericana De Calidad Educativa, 2(1), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.70625/rlce/143
  44. Wei, G., Alias, B., & Hamid, A. H. (2025). Digital teaching innovation in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.36
  45. Yang, S., Taylor-Griffiths, D., Van der Kleij, F. M., Taylor-Guy, P., & Saubern, R. (2025). Empowering teaching and learning with educational technology: Literature review. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-784-7
  46. Yang, S., Taylor-Griffiths, D., Van der Kleij, F. M., Taylor-Guy, P., & Saubern, R. (2025). Empowering teaching and learning with educational technology: Literature review. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-784-7
  47. Yingbao, L., Ismail, H. H., & Yunus, M. (2025). Teaching Pedagogies Using ICT in University Academic English Writing Across the Globe—A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal Of Learning Teaching And Educational Research, 24(3), 656-678. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.31
  48. Yue, D., Yunus, M., & Rafiq, K. R. M. (2024). Technological tools for effective learning and personalisation in higher education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/20612